| Popis: |
Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen,1,2 Amirthaa Murali2 1Binocular Vision Clinic, Sankara Nethralaya, Unit of Medical Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai 600006, India; 2Elite School of Optometry (in Collaboration with SASTRA Deemed University), Unit of Medical Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai 600016, IndiaCorrespondence: Jameel Rizwana HussaindeenBinocular Vision Clinic, Sankara Nethralaya, Unit of Medical Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, 18, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600006, IndiaTel +91-44-42271626Fax +91-44-28254180Email rizwana@snmail.orgPurpose: Accommodative insufficiency (AI), defined as the inability to stimulate accommodation in pre-presbyopic individuals, has gained much attention over recent years. Despite the enormity of the available information, there is a significant lack of clarity regarding the criteria for definition, methodology adopted for testing and diagnosis, and the varied prevalence across the globe. This review aims to gather evidence that is pertinent to the prevalence, impact and efficacy of available treatment options for AI.Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Collaboration search engines were used with the keywords prevalence, accommodative insufficiency, symptoms, plus lens, vision therapy and treatment. Peer-reviewed articles published between 1992 and 2019 were included in the review. After reviewing the studies for study methodology and robustness, 83 articles were chosen for this literature review.Results: The prevalence of AI ranges between < 1.00% and 61.6% across studies. The prevalence shows considerable variation across ethnicities and age groups. There is significant variation in the study methodology, diagnostic criteria and number of tests performed to arrive at the diagnosis. Not many studies have explored the prevalence beyond 20 years of age. The prevalence of AI is high among children with special needs. There is no high-quality evidence regarding the standard treatment protocol for AI. Both vision therapy and low plus lenses have shown efficacy in independent studies, and no studies have compared these two treatment options.Conclusion: The understanding of AI prevalence is currently limited owing to the lack of a standard set of diagnostic criteria and wide variations in the study methodology. There is a lack of high-quality evidence suggesting the best possible treatment for AI. The current gaps in the literature have been identified and future scope for exploration is elucidated.Keywords: accommodation insufficiency, amplitude of accommodation, lag of accommodation, asthenopia, vision therapy, binocular vision, accommodative facility, plus lens |
