Autor: |
Rene Gerlach, Andreas Toepfer, Matthijs Jacxsens, Viliam Zdravkovic, Primoz Potocnik |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2022 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2022) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
1471-2474 |
DOI: |
10.1186/s12891-022-05646-6 |
Popis: |
Abstract Background To determine if temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixator (ex-fix) in ankle fracture-dislocations with delayed surgery or moderate soft-tissue injury, we analysed the early complications and re-dislocation rates of cast immobilization in relation to ex-fix in patients sustaining these injuries. Methods All skeletally mature patients with a closed ankle fracture-dislocation and a minimum 6-months follow-up treated between 2007 and 2017 were included. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, injury description, treatment history and complications were assessed. Results In 160 patients (94 female; mean age 50 years) with 162 ankle fracture-dislocations, 35 underwent primary ex-fix and 127 temporizing cast immobilizations. Loss of reduction (LOR) was observed in 25 cases (19.7%) and 19 (15.0%) were converted to ex-fix. The rate of surgical site infections (ex-fix: 11.1% vs cast: 4.6%) and skin necrosis (ex-fix: 7.4% vs cast: 6.5%) did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.122 and p = 0.825). Temporizing cast immobilization led to an on average 2.7 days earlier definite surgery and 5.0 days shorter hospitalization when compared to ex-fix (p |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|