Impact of Rounding Checklists on the Outcomes of Patients Admitted to ICUs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Autor: Khrystia M. MacKinnon, BSc, MD, Samuel Seshadri, BSc, MSc, Jonathan F. Mailman, BSc (Pharm), ACPR, PharmD, CD, Eric Sy, MD, MPH
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Critical Care Explorations, Vol 6, Iss 8, p e1140 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2639-8028
00000000
DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001140
Popis: OBJECTIVES:. To evaluate the effectiveness of ICU rounding checklists on outcomes. DATA SOURCES:. Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) were searched from inception to May 10, 2024. STUDY SELECTION:. Cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials comparing the use of rounding checklists to no checklists were included. Other article types were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION:. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU and 30-day mortality; hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS); duration of mechanical ventilation; and frequency of catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Additional outcomes included healthcare provider perceptions of checklists. DATA SYNTHESIS:. Pooled estimates were obtained using an inverse-variance random-effects meta-analysis model. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. There were 30 included studies (including > 32,000 patients) in the review. Using an ICU rounding checklist was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70–0.92; 12 observational studies; 17,269 patients; I2 = 48%; very low certainty of evidence). The use of an ICU rounding checklist was also associated with reduced ICU mortality (8 observational studies, p = 0.006), 30-day mortality (2 observational studies, p < 0.001), hospital LOS (11 observational studies, p = 0.02), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) (6 observational studies, p = 0.01), and CLABSI (6 observational studies, p = 0.02). Otherwise, there were no significant differences with using ICU rounding checklists on other patient-related outcomes. Healthcare providers’ perceptions of checklists were generally positive. CONCLUSIONS:. The use of an ICU rounding checklist may improve in-hospital mortality, as well as other important patient-related outcomes. However, well-designed randomized studies are necessary to increase the certainty of evidence and determine which elements should be included in an ICU rounding checklist.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz: