Aquablation: An overview of a novel, minimally invasive surgical modality to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia
| Autor: | David J. Scholtz, Ali Hooshyari, Lodewikus Petrus Vermeulen, Timothy Burns, Flavio Ordones, Peter Gilling |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2024 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Urological Science, Vol 35, Iss 1, Pp 9-18 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1879-5226 1879-5234 00000000 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/us9.0000000000000001 |
| Popis: | Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a highly prevalent condition among aging men with significant negative impacts on quality of life. Although multiple surgical treatment modalities exist, there is an ongoing search for minimally invasive techniques to reduce hospital stays and adverse effects without compromising good functional outcomes. Aquablation is a novel minimally invasive surgical technique that combines robotic precision with heat-sparing ablation of obstructing prostate tissue. We describe the setup and mechanism of action of aquablation. A comprehensive literature search for clinical trials and recent meta-analyses was conducted and functional outcomes and adverse effects across multiple studies are summarized here. Aquablation produces comparable (if not superior) outcomes in terms of reduced International Prostate Symptom Score, improved Qmax (comparison of maximum flow velocity), and lower postvoid residuals to transurethral resection of the prostate. These findings are consistently reproduced across multiple clinical trials, including those conducted in the private sector. One major benefit of aquablation is that the risk of injury to the ejaculatory ducts appears to be significantly lower, as evident from the low percentage of cases of postoperative anejaculation issues. Adverse effects are rare, and the most significant one to mention is blood loss requiring transfusion. At present, the overall cost of aquablation is still higher than other methods of treating BPH and this is due to intraoperative and equipment costs. Postoperative care is no more expensive than other methods of BPH treatment. In conclusion, aquablation is a safe and effective surgical modality for the treatment of BPH. It can be offered as an alternative to other surgical modalities for those who wish to spare ejaculatory function. The procedure itself can be easily taught. With further development of this novel technology and increased availability, there is the potential for it to become a much more cost-effective method for surgical treatment of BPH. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|