Artificial Intelligence for Optimizing Cancer Imaging: User Experience Study

Autor: Iman Hesso, Lithin Zacharias, Reem Kayyali, Andreas Charalambous, Maria Lavdaniti, Evangelia Stalika, Tarek Ajami, Wanda Acampa, Jasmina Boban, Shereen Nabhani-Gebara
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: JMIR Cancer, Vol 10, p e52639 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2369-1999
DOI: 10.2196/52639
Popis: BackgroundThe need for increased clinical efficacy and efficiency has been the main force in developing artificial intelligence (AI) tools in medical imaging. The INCISIVE project is a European Union–funded initiative aiming to revolutionize cancer imaging methods using AI technology. It seeks to address limitations in imaging techniques by developing an AI-based toolbox that improves accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, interpretability, and cost-effectiveness. ObjectiveTo ensure the successful implementation of the INCISIVE AI service, a study was conducted to understand the needs, challenges, and expectations of health care professionals (HCPs) regarding the proposed toolbox and any potential implementation barriers. MethodsA mixed methods study consisting of 2 phases was conducted. Phase 1 involved user experience (UX) design workshops with users of the INCISIVE AI toolbox. Phase 2 involved a Delphi study conducted through a series of sequential questionnaires. To recruit, a purposive sampling strategy based on the project’s consortium network was used. In total, 16 HCPs from Serbia, Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Spain, and the United Kingdom participated in the UX design workshops and 12 completed the Delphi study. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS (IBM Corp), enabling the calculation of mean rank scores of the Delphi study’s lists. The qualitative data collected via the UX design workshops was analyzed using NVivo (version 12; Lumivero) software. ResultsThe workshops facilitated brainstorming and identification of the INCISIVE AI toolbox’s desired features and implementation barriers. Subsequently, the Delphi study was instrumental in ranking these features, showing a strong consensus among HCPs (W=0.741, P
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals