Effect of the Anesthetic Method on the Outcomes of Ureteroscopy for Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Multi-center Study of the Society of Urological Surgery Aegean Study Group
| Autor: | Fuat Kızılay, Bora İrer, Volkan Şen, Oğuzcan Erbatu, Şakir Ongün, Alperen Yıldız, Önder Çınar, Mehmet Şahin, Mehmet Oğuz Şahin, Ahmet Cihan, Oktay Üçer, Ozan Bozkurt |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Urological Surgery, Vol 5, Iss 4, Pp 170-175 (2018) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2148-9580 17537037 |
| DOI: | 10.4274/jus.2123 |
| Popis: | Objective:To analyze the effect of the anesthesia method (spinal and general) on the outcome of ureteroscopy (URS) in patients treated for proximal ureteral stones.Materials and Methods:Patients, who underwent URS for proximal ureteral stones at various urology clinics in Turkiye, were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method performed; the procedure was performed under spinal anesthesia (SA) in group 1 and general anesthesia (GA) in group 2. Patients’ demographic, perioperative data and complication rates were compared between the two groups in a retrospective manner.Results:There were 309 and 329 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean stone area and Hounsfield unit in GA group were higher (p0.05). The rate of success of URS, which is accepted as complete stone-free status, was higher in the SA group (p=0.041).Conclusion:URS, which is used in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones, has a high success rate, independent of the anesthesia method used. It is important to keep in mind the patient’s comorbidities prior to selecting the anesthesia method and that the stone area and the Hounsfield unit are the important factors affecting the outcomes. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|