Hexasodium fytate for the treatment of calciphylaxis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label extensionResearch in context

Autor: Smeeta Sinha, Sagar U. Nigwekar, Vincent Brandenburg, Lisa J. Gould, Thomas E. Serena, Sharon M. Moe, George R. Aronoff, Dinesh K. Chatoth, Jeffrey L. Hymes, Kevin J. Carroll, Gabriela Alperovich, Laurence H. Keller, Joan Perelló, Alex Gold, Glenn M. Chertow
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: EClinicalMedicine, Vol 75, Iss , Pp 102784- (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2589-5370
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102784
Popis: Summary: Background: In the CALCIPHYX trial, we investigated hexasodium fytate, an inhibitor of vascular calcification, for the treatment of calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis), a rare condition characterised by painful, non-healing skin lesions. Methods: In this international, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with an ulcerated calciphylaxis lesion and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score ≥50/100 were randomised 1:1 to hexasodium fytate 7 mg/kg or placebo intravenously during maintenance haemodialysis. Primary efficacy outcomes were an 8-item modification of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT-CUA) and Pain VAS in the intention-to-treat population. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04195906. Findings: Overall, 34/37 patients randomised to hexasodium fytate and 26/34 patients randomised to placebo completed the 12-week randomised treatment period. At Week 12, both groups (hexasodium fytate versus placebo) showed similar improvements in BWAT-CUA (mean [standard deviation (SD)], −5.3 [5.2] versus −6.0 [6.2]; least squares mean difference, 0.3 [96% confidence interval (CI): −2.5, 3.0]; p = 0.88) and Pain VAS (mean [SD], −19.5 [26.9] versus −32.2 [38.5]; least squares mean difference, 11.5 [96% CI: −4.8, 27.8]; p = 0.15). One patient randomised to placebo briefly received hexasodium fytate in error. Serious adverse events through Week 12 included: calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation (2/38 [5%] versus 11/33 [33%]) and death (1/38 [3%] versus 5/33 [15%]). During the subsequent 12 weeks of open-label hexasodium fytate and 4 weeks of follow-up, there were no additional calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation. Over the course of the entire trial, deaths were 2/38 [5%] for the hexasodium fytate group and 7/33 [21%] for the placebo group. Interpretation: In patients with calciphylaxis, BWAT-CUA and Pain VAS improved similarly in hexasodium fytate- and placebo-treated patients; over the course of the entire trial, there were fewer deaths and calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation in the hexasodium fytate group. Funding: Funded by Sanifit, a CSL Vifor company.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals