| Autor: |
Matthew Sibbald, Muqtasid Mansoor, Michael Tsang, Sarah Blissett, Geoffrey Norman |
| Jazyk: |
English<br />French |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Canadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 12, Iss 5 (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1923-1202 |
| DOI: |
10.36834/cmej.72040 |
| Popis: |
Background: Entrustment decisions may be retrospective (based on past experiences with a trainee) or real-time (based on direct observation). We investigated judgments of entrustment based on assessor prior knowledge of candidates and based on systematic direct observation, conducted in an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE). Methods: Sixteen faculty examiners provided 287 retrospective and real-time entrustment ratings of 16 cardiology trainees during OSCE stations in 2019 and 2020. Reliability and validity of these ratings were assessed by comparing correlations across stations as a measure of reliability, differences across postgraduate years as an index of construct validity, correlation to standardized in-training exam (ITE) as a measure of criterion validity, and reclassification of entrustment as a measure of consequential validity. Results: Both retrospective and real-time assessments were highly reliable (all intra-class correlations >0.86). Both increased with year of postgraduate training. Real-time entrustment ratings were significantly correlated with standardized ITE scores; retrospective ratings were not. Real-time ratings explained 37% (2019) and 46% (2020) of variance in examination scores vs. 21% (2019) and 7% (2020) for retrospective ratings. Direct observation resulted in a different level of entrustment compared with retrospective ratings in 44% of cases (p = |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
