Comparison of intravenous nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine in combination with lidocaine aerosol inhalation in awake direct laryngoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Autor: Xingxing Li, Cuiyu Xie, Yangyang Wu, Weiwei Zhong, Yao Lu, Yuanhai Li
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Perioperative Medicine, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2047-0525
DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00461-0
Popis: Abstract Background The airway should be thoroughly and accurately evaluated before anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation. Awake direct laryngoscopy (ADL) can provide rapid, accurate, and intuitive airway assessment, especially for suspected difficult airways, and sometimes eliminates the need for fiberoptic intubation in some suspicious difficult airway cases. However, an optimal regimen has not been determined. Methods In this double-blind, controlled study, prior to ADL, 60 patients scheduled for general anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive 0.75 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine (Dex group, n = 20), 0.15 mg/kg of nalbuphine (Nal group, n = 20), or a placebo (control group, n = 20) intravenously over 10 min. At the same time, all study subjects received nebulized lidocaine for 15 min. The primary outcome was patient tolerance as assessed by a 5-point ADL comfort score, while secondary outcomes included satisfaction, coughing, pain, nausea and vital signs. Results Patients undergoing ADL in the Nal group had higher tolerance scores than those in the control and Dex groups [4 (3,4) vs. 3 (2,2.75), P
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje