Data Missingness Reporting and Use of Methods to Address It in Critical Care Cohort Studies

Autor: Ting Ting Wu, PharmD, Louisa H. Smith, PhD, Lisette M. Vernooij, PhD, Emi Patel, PharmD, John W. Devlin, PharmD, MCCM
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Critical Care Explorations, Vol 5, Iss 11, p e1005 (2023)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2639-8028
00000000
DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001005
Popis: IMPORTANCE:. Failure to recognize and address data missingness in cohort studies may lead to biased results. Although Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting guidelines advocate data missingness reporting, the degree to which missingness is reported and addressed in the critical care literature remains unclear. OBJECTIVES:. To review published ICU cohort studies to characterize data missingness reporting and the use of methods to address it. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:. We searched the 2022 table of contents of 29 critical care/critical care subspecialty journals having a 2021 impact factor greater than or equal to 3 to identify published prospective clinical or retrospective database cohort studies enrolling greater than or equal to 100 patients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:. In duplicate, two trained researchers conducted a manuscript/supplemental material PDF word search for “missing*” and extracted study type, patient age, ICU type, sample size, missingness reporting, and the use of methods to address it. RESULTS:. A total of 656 studies were reviewed. Of the 334 of 656 (50.9%) studies mentioning missingness, missingness was reported for greater than or equal to 1 variable in 234 (70.1%) and it exceeded 5% for at least one variable in 160 (47.9%). Among the 334 studies mentioning missingness, 88 (26.3%) used exclusion criteria, 36 (10.8%) used complete-case analysis, and 164 (49.1%) used a formal method to avoid missingness. In these 164 studies, imputation only was used in 100 (61.0%), an analytic strategy only in 24 (14.6%), and both in 40 (24.4%). Only missingness greater than 5% (in ≥ 1 variable) was independently associated with greater use of a missingness method (adjusted odds ratio 2.91; 95% CI, 1.85–4.60). Among 140 studies using imputation, multiple imputation was used in 87 studies (62.1%) and simple imputation in 49 studies (35.0%). For the 64 studies using an analytic method, 12 studies (18.8%) assigned missingness as an unknown category, whereas sensitivity analysis was used in 47 studies (73.4%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:. Among published critical care cohort studies, only half mentioned result missingness, one-third reported actual missingness and only one-quarter used a method to manage missingness. Educational strategies to promote missingness reporting and resolution methods are required.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz: