| Autor: |
Kavitha Girish, Thilaka Muthiah, Dalim Kumar Baidya, Renu Sinha, Vimi Rewari, Souvik Maitra, Manpreet Kaur, Rajeshwari Subramaniam |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2024 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Vol 52, Iss 4, Pp 147-153 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2667-6370 |
| DOI: |
10.4274/TJAR.2024.241624 |
| Popis: |
Objective: Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA) is associated with a 58-77% success rate in blind intubation. The newer laryngeal mask airway (LMA) blockbuster is specially designed to facilitate easier endotracheal intubation and may have a higher success rate. The current study aimed to compare the success rate of endotracheal intubation using the Air-Q ILA and LMA blockbuster. Methods: After ethics committee approval and informed written consent, 140 adult patients with normal airways who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were recruited for this randomized controlled trial. Blind endotracheal intubation was performed using the Air-Q ILA in group A and the LMA blockbuster in group B with special maneuvers and/or tubes in the second attempt. Fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guidance was used in the third attempt if required. The primary outcome was the success rate of intubation without FOB assistance. The number of attempts for supraglottic airway (SGA) insertion, the time taken for SGA insertion, and the overall intubation time was also noted. Results: The success rate of intubation without FOB guidance was significantly higher in group B than in group A [91.4% vs 55.7%; relative risk (RR) 1.68; (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34, 2.11); p |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
