Predicting complications of major head and neck oncological surgery: an evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator

Autor: Peter S. Vosler, Mario Orsini, Danny J. Enepekides, Kevin M. Higgins
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol 47, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2018)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1916-0216
DOI: 10.1186/s40463-018-0269-8
Popis: Abstract Background The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) universal surgical risk calculator is an online tool intended to improve the informed consent process and surgical decision-making. The risk calculator uses a database of information from 585 hospitals to predict a patient’s risk of developing specific postoperative outcomes. Methods Patient records at a major Canadian tertiary care referral center between July 2015 and March 2017 were reviewed for surgical cases including one of six major head and neck oncologic surgeries: total thyroidectomy, total laryngectomy, hemiglossectomy, partial glossectomy, laryngopharyngectomy, and composite resection. Preoperative information for 107 patients was entered into the risk calculator and compared to observed postoperative outcomes. Statistical analysis of the risk calculator was completed for the entire study population, for stratification by procedure, and by utilization of microvascular reconstruction. Accuracy was assessed using the ratio of predicted to observed outcomes, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC), Brier score, and the Wilcoxon signed–ranked test. Results The risk calculator accurately predicted the incidences for 11 of 12 outcomes for patients that did not undergo free flap reconstruction (NFF group), but was less accurate for patients that underwent free flap reconstruction (FF group). Length of stay (LOS) analysis showed similar results, with predicted and observed LOS statistically different in the overall population and FF group analyses (p = 0.001 for both), but not for the NFF group analysis (p = 0.764). All outcomes in the NFF group, when analyzed for calibration, met the threshold value (Brier scores
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals