Modernisation of poor relief in Russia: selecting for the 'worthy poor' in Sheremetev’s almshouse (the 1800s)
| Autor: | Maya Lavrinovich |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | ruština |
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
institutions of poor relief
social status «worthy poor» sheremetev’s almshouse nikolai sheremetev aleksei malinovskii benjamin thompson rumford alexander i hamburg patriotic society институты призрения социальный статус «достойные бедные» странноприимный дом н. п. шереметев а. ф. малиновский б. томпсон рамфорд александр i гамбургское патриотическое общество History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics DK1-4735 History and principles of religions BL660-2680 |
| Zdroj: | Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svâto-Tihonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta: Seriâ II. Istoriâ, Istoriâ Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi, Vol 91, Iss 91, Pp 28-46 (2019) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1991-6434 2409-4811 |
| DOI: | 10.15382/sturII201991.28-46 |
| Popis: | At the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries, the new ideas on poor relief began to find their way into Russia. On the one hand, they were based on the assessment of need, and on the other hand, on the moral qualities of the potential recipient. N. P. Sheremetev and A.F. Malinovskiy, who managed the construction of the Almshouse and developed its system of in- and outdoor relief, drew their attention to the “Rumford system” and the related practice of Hamburg Patriotic Society that developed the principles of selection of the recipients of outdoor relief. These systems focused on the “new poor”, i.e. working people whose earnings were not suffi cient to provide for themselves and their families. The adherents of this system did not consider poverty to be a consequence of personal immorality, as the British social reformers insisted. Still, these systems complemented each other. The Hamburg society applied the assessment of need and an individual approach when granting assistance; B. Thompson Rumford taught the inmates of the workhouse labor skills and fed the poor on the regular basis. Sheremetev and Malinovskiy decided to cut off “parasites” and “vagabonds”, because they did not aim to reeducate them, thus having excluded the lower urban strata. They also abandoned the idea of “Rumford soup” but did not abandon the idea of selecting the needy who would be “worth” to be granted allowances. They took into account not only the objective criteria (large family or illness) but also the years of “immaculate” service, one’s industry and “decency”. As a result, the Moscow middle-ranking offi cials and officers, who belonged to Malinovskii’s milieu and had obtained recommendations from the well-known persons, prevailed as the perspective recipients of the outdoor poor relief, and social status turned to be the main criterion of selection. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|