Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method
| Autor: | Gian Carlos Ramirez-Ubillus, Carlos Ricardo Neira-Montoya, Eduardo Eulogio Sedano-Gelvet, Joel Fernando Verona-Cueva |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial, Vol 56 |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1676-2444 1678-4774 |
| DOI: | 10.5935/1676-2444.20200036 |
| Popis: | ABSTRACT Introduction: Automated hematology analyzers are able to produce low platelet counts with great precision and accuracy. However, these analyzers may produce erroneous counts due to the presence of interferences. Therefore, additional methodologies are required to confirm platelet counts, such as blood smear and a direct count, using the Neubauer chamber. Objective: To validate the reliability estimate produced by the G&S method. Material and method: One hundred and fifty platelet counts were analyzed in the hematology and emergency laboratories of the Hospital Nacional Docente Madre-Niño San Bartolomé, in Lima, Peru, by four methodologies: one optical platelet count (PLTO), one indirect blood smear count (Indirect), and two direct counts (Direct and G&S). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to compare the groups. Results: A significant difference was observed in the distribution of the four methodologies and, after applying the post-hoc analysis, a similarity between the PLTO and G&S methods was found. Also, the Direct, G&S and Indirect methods showed a positive correlation with the PLTO method. The Bland-Altman test demonstrated that the G&S method presented a high agreement with the PLTO method. Conclusion: The G&S method is inexpensive, easy to perform, and has demonstrated statistical reliability concerning the automated methodology, and is useful for confirming low platelet counts after a suspected error by the automated equipment or when this device is not available for use. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|