Autor: |
Samantha Högl-Roy, BSc, Nader Hejrati, MD, Felix C. Stengel, MD, Stefan Motov, MD, Anand Veeravagu, MD, Benjamin Martens, MD, Martin N. Stienen, MD/FEBNS |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2024 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
North American Spine Society Journal, Vol 19, Iss , Pp 100533- (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2666-5484 |
DOI: |
10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100533 |
Popis: |
ABSTRACT: Background: Transforaminal anterior release (TFAR) is a technical extension of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure with deliberate release of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL). Methods: In a retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, consecutive adult patients undergoing TLIF surgery at L4/L5 and/or L5/S1 between 01/2018 and 12/2022 for degenerative disc disease or deformity were considered. The TFAR group (with ALL release) was compared to a standard TLIF group (without ALL release), matched in a 1:3 ratio. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were built to estimate the likelihood of any adverse event (AE), reoperation, and excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months. Results: Of 438 patients, 18 undergoing TFAR were matched to 53 undergoing standard TLIF. TFAR procedures were frequently part of extensive, anterior-posterior or multilevel fusion procedures with longer surgery time and higher blood loss. The rates of intraoperative surgical AEs were similar (16.7 vs. 11.3%, p=.789). The rates and severities of surgical AEs, as well as reoperation rates and clinical outcomes were similar at time of discharge, 90 days, and 12 months postoperatively (all p>.05). TFAR allowed for an increase in total lumbar lordosis of 16.1° and in lumbar lordosis between L4 and S1 of 16.3° at discharge, which was maintained during follow-up. In both the uni- and multivariable models, patients undergoing TFAR were as likely as patients undergoing standard TLIF to experience any AE (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.21–2.94), any reoperation (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.11–1.90) or excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 0.52–7.74). Conclusions: The TFAR technique has a safety profile which is comparable to the standard TLIF procedure, but it allows for a greater restoration of lumbar lordosis at L4-S1. We suggest considering the TFAR technique in selected patients with sagittal imbalance and mobile segments for restoration of lumbar lordosis. |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|