| Autor: |
João Pedro Lima, Xiajing Chu, Gordon H Guyatt, Wimonchat Tangamornsuksan |
| Jazyk: |
English<br />Portuguese |
| Rok vydání: |
2023 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, Vol 49, Iss 4 (2023) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1806-3756 |
| DOI: |
10.36416/1806-3756/e20230167 |
| Popis: |
ABSTRACT Optimal clinical decision-making requires understanding of evidence regarding benefits, harms, and burdens of alternative management options. Rigorously conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses offer accurate summaries of the evidence. However, such summaries may review only low-certainty evidence, in the process highlighting that no single decision is likely to be best for all patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach offers a systematic and transparent method for rating certainty of evidence in systematic reviews. In this paper, we will address the importance of assessing the certainty associated with bodies of evidence; explain how the GRADE system rates the certainty of evidence from systematic reviews; and present the GRADE evidence to decision framework for moving from evidence to strong or weak recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
