| Autor: |
David Virós Porcuna, Laura Pardo Muñoz, Constanza Viña Soria, Viviana Nicastro, Mar Palau Viarnès, Carlos Pollán Guisasola |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, Vol 6, Iss 5, Pp 1062-1067 (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2378-8038 |
| DOI: |
10.1002/lio2.662 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Objective Surgery is the standard treatment for most tumors in the prestyloid parapharyngeal space (PPS) but it can be a challenging procedure because of the anatomical complexity of the area. Prestyloid surgery can be performed with various lateral approaches or with a medial approach using transoral robotic surgery (TORS)—either alone or in combination with a transcervical incision. We have retrospectively compared our center's results with lateral and medial approaches. Methods Between 2015 and 2020, 28 patients with prestyloid PPS tumors underwent surgery at our center: 14 with lateral approaches, including transcervical, transcervical‐parotid, and transcervical‐mandibular, and 14 with medial approaches (12 with TORS and two with TORS plus a transcervical incision). We compared surgical time, postsurgical complications, length of hospital stay, need for feeding tube, and relapse‐free survival in the two patient groups. Results Pleomorphic adenoma was the most frequent tumor and 60.7% of the tumors were benign. Tumor volume and maximum length were similar in the two groups of patients. Intraoperative image guidance and ultrasound were used in 33% of TORS. TORS was associated with less surgical time, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays. Recurrence rates were similar in the two groups. Conclusion The medial approach by TORS offers superior results in prestyloid tumors than the open lateral approach and can be refined by intraoperative guidance. Level of Evidence: 4 |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
