Acute effects of commercial energy drink consumption on exercise performance and cardiovascular safety: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial
Autor: | Nile F. Banks, Emily M. Rogers, Nate J. Helwig, Laura E. Schwager, Justin P. Alpers, Sydni L. Schulte, Emma R. Trachta, Christopher M. Lockwood, Nathaniel D.M. Jenkins |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2024 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, Vol 21, Iss 1 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: | article |
ISSN: | 15502783 1550-2783 |
DOI: | 10.1080/15502783.2023.2297988 |
Popis: | ABSTRACTThe aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of a non-caloric energy drink (C4E) compared to a traditional sugar-containing energy drink (MED) and non-caloric placebo (PLA) on exercise performance and cardiovascular safety. Thirty healthy, physically active males (25 ± 4 y) completed three experimental visits under semi-fasted conditions (5–10 h) and in randomized order, during which they consumed C4E, MED, or PLA matched for volume, appearance, taste, and mouthfeel. One hour after drink consumption, participants completed a maximal, graded exercise test (GXT) with measurement of pulmonary gases, an isometric leg extension fatigue test (ISOFTG), and had their cardiac electrical activity (ECG), leg blood flow (LBF), and blood pressure (BP) measured throughout the visit. Neither MED nor C4E had an ergogenic effect on maximal oxygen consumption, time to exhaustion, or peak power during the GXT (p > 0.05). Compared to PLA, MED reduced fat oxidation (respiratory exchange ratio (RER) +0.030 ± 0.01; p = 0.026) during the GXT and did not influence ISOFTG performance. Compared to PLA, C4E did not alter RER (p = 0.94) and improved impulse during the ISOFTG (+0.658 ± 0.25 V·s; p = 0.032). Relative to MED, C4E did not significantly improve gas exchange threshold (p = 0.05–0.07). Both MED and C4E increased systolic BP at rest (+7.1 ± 1.2 mmHg; p |
Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |