| Autor: |
David J. Gagnon, Richard R. Riker, Frank Chessa, Christine Lord, Ashley Eldridge, Meghan Searight, Sarah Bockian, Barbara McCrum, Teresa L. May, Douglas Sawyer, David B. Seder |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Resuscitation Plus, Vol 12, Iss , Pp 100322- (2022) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2666-5204 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100322 |
| Popis: |
Aim: Describe community consultation and surrogate consent rates for two Exception From Informed Consent (EFIC) trials for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) - before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The PEARL study (2016–2018) randomized OOHCA patients without ST-elevation to early cardiac catheterization or not. Community consultation included flyers, radio announcements, newspaper advertisements, mailings, and in-person surveys at basketball games and ED waiting rooms. The PROTECT trial (2021-present) randomizes OOHCA survivors to prophylactic ceftriaxone or placebo; the community consultation plan during the pandemic included city council presentations, social media posts, outpatient flyers, but no in-person encounters. Demographics for PROTECT community consultation were compared to PEARL and INTCAR registry data, with p-value 60 years old (14 % vs 53 %;p |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
