Lateral left ventricular lead position is superior to posterior position in long‐term outcome of patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy

Autor: Anett Behon, Walter Richard Schwertner, Eperke Dóra Merkel, Attila Kovács, Bálint Károly Lakatos, Endre Zima, László Gellér, Valentina Kutyifa, Annamária Kosztin, Béla Merkely
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: ESC Heart Failure, Vol 7, Iss 6, Pp 3374-3382 (2020)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2055-5822
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13066
Popis: Abstract Aims Preferring side branch of coronary sinus during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation has been empirical due to the limited data on the association of left ventricular (LV) lead position and long‐term clinical outcome. We evaluated the long‐term all‐cause mortality by LV lead non‐apical positions and further characterized them by interlead electrical delay (IED). Methods and results In our retrospective database, 2087 patients who underwent CRT implantation were registered between 2000 and 2018. Those with non‐apical LV lead locations were classified into anterior (n = 108), posterior (n = 643), and lateral (n = 1336) groups. All‐cause mortality was assessed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox analyses. Echocardiographic response was measured 6 months after CRT implantation. During the median follow‐up time of 3.7 years, 1150 (55.1%) patients died—710 (53.1%) with lateral, 78 (72.2%) with anterior, and 362 (56.3%) with posterior positions. When we investigated the risk of all‐cause mortality, there was a significantly lower rate of death in patients with lateral LV lead location when compared with those with an anterior (P
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals