| Autor: |
Marilù Porchia |
| Jazyk: |
English<br />Spanish; Castilian<br />French<br />Italian |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
European Papers, Vol 2022 7, Iss 2, Pp 545-560 (2022) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2499-8249 |
| DOI: |
10.15166/2499-8249/577 |
| Popis: |
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2022 7(2), 545-560 | European Forum Insight of 28 July 2022 | (Table of Contents) I. Premessa. - II. La possibilità di deroga all'applicazione della direttiva 2008/115/CE nel nuovo Patto su migrazione e asilo. - III. La possibilità di deroga all'applicazione della direttiva 2008/115/CE nelle proposte di risposta alla strumentalizzazione dei migranti. - IV. La possibilità di deroga alla direttiva 2008/115/CE a fronte della modifica del regolamento sul meccanismo di valutazione e monitoraggio di Schengen (SEMM). - V. Considerazioni critiche e conclusioni. | (Abstract) Art. 2(2)(a) of the Directive 2008/115/EC (Return Directive) provides the conditions whereby the Member States can derogate from some provisions of the directive itself. An amendment to remove this clause is under discussion before the European Parliament, as part of the negotiations on the directive's recast. Derogations from the scope of the directive challenge the monitoring of compli-ance with human rights obligations and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Meanwhile, the proposal on the reform of the Schengen Evaluation and Monitoring Mechanism (SEMM) aims for an effective monitoring of the respect of rights at external borders. This implies greater attention to the correct implementation of the Return Directive. However, in the new Pact for migration and asylum, the derogation clause is applicable to both the proposal for a Regulation on screening at external borders and the proposal for a common procedure for international protection. Derogations from the Return Directive are also contained in the proposals aimed at addressing situations of instrumentalisation of migration and asylum. The analysis of these provisions gives a picture of an incoherent normative system, whose antinomies may foster or further complicate the already troubled advancement of negotiations on the Return Directive and on the Pact. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
