| Autor: |
Bini Faizal, Bhavya Surendran, Madhumita Kumar |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, Vol 88, Iss 5, Pp 691-700 (2022) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1808-8694 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.09.012 |
| Popis: |
Introduction: The end point of treatment in skull base osteomyelitis is a matter of debate. A treatment based on symptoms alone is fraught with recurrence. There is a need to restrict imaging though more informative. The inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate used commonly need a detailed evaluation to optimize its utility. Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers with a hybrid PET scan in monitoring skull base osteomyelitis. The secondary objective was to obtain a cut-off value of these markers to decide upon antibiotic termination. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care center with fifty-one patients with skull base osteomyelitis meeting eligibility criteria. Patients diagnosed with skull base osteomyelitis were serially monitored with weekly markers and PET scan after the initiation of treatment. A hybrid scan was taken at 6–8 weeks of treatment and repeated if required. The follow-up period varied from 6 weeks to 15 months. The outcome measures studied were the values of markers and the metabolic activity of PET scan when the patient became asymptomatic and when disease-free. Results: C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate had a statistically significant correlation to disease activity in PET tomography scan as a prognostic marker. Both showed good clinical correlation. A cut off value of ≤ 3.6 mg/L for C-reactive protein and ≤ 35 mm/hour for erythrocyte sedimentation rate were taken as normalized values. Conclusion: A consistent normalized value of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for 8–12 weeks in an asymptomatic patient may be an indicator of disease control, though not cure. So, relying solely on markers alone for antibiotic termination may cause relapse. It may be used cautiously in a peripheral setting without access to more specific hybrid scans. In a tertiary care, follow-up scans may be done based on the titres, thereby limiting the radiation exposure. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
