| Autor: |
Susan Wiltrakis, Ruth Hwu, Sherita Holmes, Srikant Iyer, Nandranie Goodwin, Claire Mathai, Scott Gillespie, Kiran B. Hebbar, Nora Colman |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2024 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Advances in Simulation, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2059-0628 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s41077-024-00296-1 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Background Cognitive load impacts performance of debriefers and learners during simulations, but limited data exists examining debriefer cognitive load. The aim of this study is to compare the cognitive load of the debriefers during simulation-based team training (SbTT) with Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) debriefing and Traditional Reflective Debriefing (TRD). We hypothesize that cognitive load will be reduced during RCDP compared to TRD. Methods This study was part of a large-scale, interdisciplinary team training program at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Egleston Pediatric Emergency Department, with 164 learners (physicians, nurses, medical technicians, paramedics, and respiratory therapists (RTs)). Eight debriefers (main facilitators and discipline-specific coaches) led 28 workshops, which were quasi-randomized to either RCDP or TRD. Each session began with a baseline medical resuscitation scenario and cognitive load measurement using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX), and the NASA TLX was repeated immediately following either TRD or RCDP debriefing. Raw scores of the NASA TLX before and after intervention were compared. ANOVA tests were used to compare differences in NASA TLX scores before and after intervention between the RCDP and TRD groups. Results For all debriefers, mean NASA TLX scores for physical demands and frustration significantly decreased (− 0.8, p = 0.004 and − 1.3, p = 0.002) in TRD and mean perceived performance success significantly increased (+ 2.4, p |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink