| Autor: |
Justin Kitzes, Rachael Blake, Sara Bombaci, Melissa Chapman, Sandra M. Duran, Tao Huang, Maxwell B. Joseph, Samuel Lapp, Sergio Marconi, William K. Oestreich, Tessa A. Rhinehart, Anna K. Schweiger, Yiluan Song, Thilina Surasinghe, Di Yang, Kelsey Yule |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Ecosphere, Vol 12, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2150-8925 |
| DOI: |
10.1002/ecs2.3795 |
| Popis: |
Abstract A core goal of the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) is to measure changes in biodiversity across the 30‐yr horizon of the network. In contrast to NEON’s extensive use of automated instruments to collect environmental data, NEON’s biodiversity surveys are almost entirely conducted using traditional human‐centric field methods. We believe that the combination of instrumentation for remote data collection and machine learning models to process such data represents an important opportunity for NEON to expand the scope, scale, and usability of its biodiversity data collection while potentially reducing long‐term costs. In this manuscript, we first review the current status of instrument‐based biodiversity surveys within the NEON project and previous research at the intersection of biodiversity, instrumentation, and machine learning at NEON sites. We then survey methods that have been developed at other locations but could potentially be employed at NEON sites in future. Finally, we expand on these ideas in five case studies that we believe suggest particularly fruitful future paths for automated biodiversity measurement at NEON sites: acoustic recorders for sound‐producing taxa, camera traps for medium and large mammals, hydroacoustic and remote imagery for aquatic diversity, expanded remote and ground‐based measurements for plant biodiversity, and laboratory‐based imaging for physical specimens and samples in the NEON biorepository. Through its data science‐literate staff and user community, NEON has a unique role to play in supporting the growth of such automated biodiversity survey methods, as well as demonstrating their ability to help answer key ecological questions that cannot be answered at the more limited spatiotemporal scales of human‐driven surveys. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text