Huawei or the US way? Why Brazil and South Africa did not securitize 5G
| Autor: | Janis van der Westhuizen |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | English<br />Spanish; Castilian<br />Portuguese |
| Rok vydání: | 2024 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, Vol 67, Iss 2 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1983-3121 0034-7329 |
| DOI: | 10.1590/0034-7329202400216 |
| Popis: | Abstract In the face of growing restrictions against Huawei in much of ‘the West’ because of the US’ efforts to portray its 5G roll out as a security threat, most of the developing world has resisted such efforts. By drawing on Balzacq’s analytical framework - centred on the degree of congruence between the audience, the securitizing agent’s ability to construct a convincing frame of reference, the role of contextual factors, and securitization counterclaims - it is argued that 5G securitization failed in Brazil and South Africa (2019-2022). Although the contextual factors in both cases were similar (economic interests with China, Huawei’s established role and access to Covid vaccines), in South Africa, narratives of development and cost/benefit considerations overshadowed perceptions of security risk. In Brazil in contrast, some factions within the Bolsonaro government agreed to the US’ securitization frame, whilst others, citing the risk of damaging relations with Beijing and the sheer costs of replacing Huawei infrastructure, disagreed. In both cases, the contextual factors diminished Huawei as a source of risk, especially in the Brazilian case, tipping the scale in support of those seeking to maintain good relations with Beijing. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|