| Autor: |
Jason M. Beneciuk, Dorothy Verstandig, Chuck Taylor, Doug Scott, Joan Levin, Raine Osborne, Joel E. Bialosky, Trevor A. Lentz, Tava Buck, Anita L. Davis, Christina Harder, Monika B. Beneciuk, Virgil Wittmer, James Sylvester, Robert Rowe, David McInnes, Tad P. Fisher, Lisa McGarrie |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2020 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Research Involvement and Engagement, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2020) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2056-7529 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s40900-020-00192-8 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Background Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a global public health problem with increased societal burden. Increased attention has focused toward patient and other stakeholder perspectives when determining future MSK pain research priorities, however infrastructure and capacity building within the community are needed for individuals and organizations to participate in patient-centered outcomes research. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe our collaborative experiences with several MSK pain stakeholders and processes to identify a top priority research topic. Methods Lunch meetings and formalized workshops were used to develop infrastructure for engaging patients and other stakeholders with early capacity building for partners to identify MSK pain research ideas based on their personal experiences. Additional capacity building and engagement through literature searching further prepared partners to contribute informed decisions about MSK pain research topics and subsequent selection of an important research question. Results Several key deliverables (e.g., Governance Document, Communication Plan) were developed and completed over the course of this project to provide partnership structure. Other key deliverables included a list of preliminary comparative effectiveness research ideas (n = 8) and selection of shared decision making for MSK pain as the top priority research topic with patient partners identifying pain self-efficacy as an important outcome domain. Conclusions Our patient partners provided the catalyst for identifying shared decision making as a high priority research topic based on a wide spectrum of stakeholder perspectives and unique experiences. Patient partners were primarily identified using a single rehabilitation health system and clinician partners were heavily weighted by physical therapists which may have introduced selection bias. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink