Autor: |
Gry St-Martin, Ann Lindstrand, Synne Sandbu, Thea Kølsen Fischer |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2018 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 6 (2018) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2296-2565 |
DOI: |
10.3389/fpubh.2018.00131 |
Popis: |
The World Health Organization recommends inclusion of rotavirus vaccines in national immunization programs (NIPs) worldwide. Nordic countries are usually considered comparable in terms of demographics and health-care services and have comparable rotavirus disease burden. Nevertheless, the countries have reached different decisions regarding rotavirus vaccine: Norway and Finland have already introduced rotavirus vaccines into their NIPs and Sweden is currently changing its recommendation and vaccines will now be introduced on a national scale while Denmark has decided against it. This study focuses on the selection and interpretation of medical and epidemiological evidence used during the decision-making processes in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. The so-called “severity criteria” is identified as one of the main reasons for the different policy decisions reached across the Nordic countries. |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|