Bench-Top Comparison of Three Different Types of Stents Used for Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis
| Autor: | Jung-soo Park, Hyo Sung Kwak, Jin-Woo Kim |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Neurointervention, Vol 15, Iss 3, Pp 117-125 (2020) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2093-9043 2233-6273 |
| DOI: | 10.5469/neuroint.2020.00248 |
| Popis: | Purpose Four key bench-top tests, including trackability, conformability, wall-apposition, and bending stiffness, were performed to understand the mechanical characteristics in 3 different types of stents applicable for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: Balloon-expandable D+Storm, Pro-Kinetic Energy, and self-expandable Wingspan stents. Materials and Methods Trackability was assessed by measuring the tracking forces of each stent with its delivery systems. Conformability and wall apposition were quantified and analyzed using curved vessel models. A 3-point bending test was employed to evaluate bending stiffness. Results D+Storm showed the lowest tracking forces while the conformability of the Wingspan stent was superior to that of the tested stents. Pro-Kinetic Energy and D+Storm had better wall apposition in curved vessels than the Wingspan stent. Bending stiffness of the Wingspan stent was notably lower, whereas no significant differences were found between D+Storm and Energy. Pro-Kinetic Energy and D+Storm not only indicated lower gap ratios between the struts and the vessel wall but also maintained good wall apposition even in the curved model. Conclusion These bench-top measurements may provide clinicians with useful information in regard to selecting suitable stents for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|