Potential Erosion Assessment of Dastkan Region Using SLEMSA Model

Autor: M. Entezari, R. Sharifi, Z. Eizadi, S.S. Shahzeydi
Jazyk: perština
Rok vydání: 2013
Předmět:
Zdroj: جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی محیطی, Vol 23, Iss 4, Pp 109-120 (2013)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2008-5362
2252-0910
Popis: Extended abstract1- IntroductionIn geographical studies, soil is not only considered as a natural resource, but also it is exposed to a corrupted danger called erosion, so it needs study, guarding and control. On one hand, the concept of erosion, from geomorphological point of view, is referred to processes which shape the earth surface, and on the other hand, it is related to the factors of soil guarding. The fact is that different results are derived from evaluating erosion risks through various methods, and quantity and type of soil erosion also vary from one place to another. These quantities would be very useful for planning.First Elwell (1978) applied the SLEMSA Model to assess rates of erosion in Zimbabwe. Her research showed that this strategy is acceptable for the study of soil conservation in the country. After Elwell and Stocking (1984 and 1982), this model was used for assessing erosion in North Africa. Igwe et al (1997) to estimate the potential risk of erosion in South West Nigeria compared the USLE and SLEMSA methodology for mapping erosion and indicated the positive consequences of SLEMSA methodology. Josefine Svorin (2003) examined three models of USLE / RUSLE, SLEMSA, Morgan and Morgan- Finney. Mouinou Igue Attanda (2002) Quality of water erosion in lowland humid Benin using the two models, USLE and SLEMSA assessed and has concluded that the model SLEMSA due to the similarity of the results with the results of projects carried out, fit better with tropical there. Igwe et al (1997) examined the use of models to estimate the potential risk of erosion USLE and SLEMSA in mapping erosion in South West Nigeria have paid. The purpose of this study Dastkan watershed erosion rates, erosion, and identify categories of factors are.2- MethodologyIn the first, boundary of the study area was determined, and then through statistical techniques the factors interact in the SLEMSA model were examined. Collecting information and the primary consideration of factors models, and the combination of digital layers, were done.3– DiscussionThe SLEMSA model divides the soil erosion environment into four physical systems: crop, climate, soil and topography. Major control variables are then selected for each system on the basis that they should be easily measurable and the dominant factor within each system (Stocking, 1980). These control variables are subsequently combined into three sub-models; the bare soil sub model, topographical sub model, and the crop sub model. The main model is then simply the three sub models multiplied together. The SLEMSA equation is as follows:Z = K * C * XWhereZ = the mean annual soil loss from the land (in tons.ha-1.yr-1)K = Erodibility Factor (in tons.ha-1.yr-1)X = Topographic FactorC = Crop factor 4– ConclusionThe present study shows that medium erosion class (5to 40 tonnes per hectare per year) Dastkan watershed is the most of the area. In general we can say the area is low to moderate ability erodible. SLEMSA model for estimating erosion, environmental conditions are examined. These factors in watershed erosion rates in different influence, its role in the model represent different values. In the region, 5 erosion focuses in the north part were observed. Considering influential factors on these regions showed that the main erosion factor at the risk focuses was at first rain energy and the other factors were the ground gradient and plant covering .In addition, soil fatigue capability, which was the main erosion factor in the region, did not play so much role at the risk focuses .The research finding showed that water erosion is the dominant type of erosion in the region and erosion rate of average 1.412 ton per hectare is lower, compared to erosion rate of the country.Keywords: Erosion, Dastkan, SLEMSA, GISReferencesAttanda Mouinou Igue (2002),"The Qualitative Assessment of water erosion risk in moist savanna of Benin.12 th ISCO conference Beijing.Becher, H. H. (2003),"Estimating soil loss due to erosion by water or wind",US Geologyical survey National water. Beven, K. J.(1985),"Distributed models hydrological forcasting",John wiley and sons Ltd, pp. 405-435.C.AIgwe.F.O.R.AKamigbo, J.S.C.M bagwu (1997). Application of SLEMSA and USLE erosion models for potential erosion hazard mapping in south estern Nigeria, University of Nigeria.Cartagena, D. F. (2004),"Remotely sensed land cover parameter extraction for watershed erosion modeling", www.itc.nl Ehler, M. (2005)," Remote sensing for environmental monitoring", Interior Environment and Related Agencis, United states, pp. 275 Elwell HA. (1978). Modelling soil losses in southern Africa. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 23: 117–127.Elwell, H.A. & Stocking, M.A. (1984) Estimating soil life-span.Trop. Agric. (in press).Farm Management Handbook (1982) Department of Agricultural, Technical and Extension Services, Harare, Zimbabwe.Elwell, H.A., and Stocking, M.A., (1982): Developing a simple yet practical method of soil-loss estimation.Tropical Agriculture, 59:43-48.Foster, G. R. (1988),"Modeling soil erosion and sediment yield", Soil erosion research methods, Soil and water conservation society, Ankey,Iowa, pp. 97-117Kaiser, C. (1999),"Erosion risk assessment for the Barossa Reservior catchment", North American, s environment, UNEP/Earth print, pp. 230 Malava, J. and Bonda, F. (1999), “Proposal for research to support erosion hazard assessment in Malawi", Agricultureal engineering Bunda College of Agriculture, www.ag.arizona.eduMannaerts, C. M. M. (1992),"Assessment of the transterability of laboratory rainfall – runoff and rainfall – soil loss relationships to field and catchment scales”. PhD Thesis Gent University Belgium, pp. 210Paroda, R. S. (1998)," Indian association of soil and water conservationsts" 8th International soils conservation conterence, pp. 1684 Part I: The technique.Geografiska Annaler 70 (A.3): 169-180Pimetel, D. (1995),"Enviromental and Economic cost of soil erosion and conservation benefits",Science Vol.267, PP.24 Schulze, R.E. (1979) Soil loss in the key areas of the Drakensburg -a regional application of the soil loss estimation model for southern Africa (SLEMSA). In: Hydrology and Water Resources of the Drakensburg, 149-167. Natal Town and Regional Planning Commission, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.Stocking, M.A. (1982) Modelling soil losses. Suggestions for a Brazilian approach. UNDP BRA/82/001, Report of the Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia.Stocking, M.A., Chakela, Q. and Elwell, H.A., 1988: An improved method for erosion hazard mapping.Svorin Josfin (2003),A test of three soil erosion models incorporated in to a geographical information system, Hydrological processes17, university of Copenhagen.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz: