| Autor: |
Hajder Đurađ |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2018 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Agroznanje, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 51-58 (2018) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2233-0070 |
| DOI: |
10.7251/AGREN1801051H |
| Popis: |
The aim of conducted investigation was to evaluate defined objectives, presented materials and methods and interpretation of results in student's master theses in order to assess their scientific contribution. Firstly, evaluation was performed by using the traditional methodology and fuzzy evaluation was then conducted in a Fuzzy Logic Toolbox. Obtained values from two levels of evaluation were generally compared. Results indicate that fulfilment of defined criteria of evaluation is moderate. Evaluation mark in classical approach was higher in most cases but fuzzy approach showed some advantages. The criteria fulfilment for the logical-mathematical argumentation, as a prerequisite for the analysis of scientific results, showed its paramount importance in the process of classical and fuzzy evaluation as well. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
