Biomechanical comparison of percutaneous posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy and anterior cervical decompression and fusion on the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

Autor: Jiabin Ren, Rui Li, Kai Zhu, Xuexin Han, Xin Liu, Yu He, Zhaozhong Sun
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2019)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1113-1
Popis: Abstract Background Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy is a common spinal disease. The traditional surgical treatment consists of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), but it presents problems such as trauma and fusion complications. Percutaneous posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy (PPECD) is a new minimally invasive technology that has produced good clinical outcome, but further biomechanical comparisons are needed to guide the clinical work. The goal of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the two methods by finite element analysis. Method On the basis of the computed tomography scanning data of five cases of cervical spondylosis after PPECD surgery, five cases after ACDF surgery, and five non-surgical patients, software (Mimics 15.0, HyperMesh 12.0, and Abaqus 6.13) was adopted to establish a C1–C7 segment 3D finite element model. We also applied 50 N vertical load on the C1 surface and 1.5 Nm torque, simulated the anteflexion, rear protraction, and left and right lateral flexion and rotation, and observed the stability, stress distribution, and Cobb angular change of the surgical section of the cervical vertebra under different working conditions. Result The postoperative model under different working conditions demonstrated poorer stability than the non-surgical group, but the stability of the PPECD group was close to that of the non-surgical group. The stability of the ACDF group was the worst, especially when making lateral bending and posterior extension. The ACDF group also showed significant differences. The PPECD group showed uniform stress distribution, whereas the ACDF group was under large stress, which was primarily concentrated in the internal fixation system. In addition, the implant showed the potential for fracture. The Cobb angle of surgery section of the PPECD group was smaller than that of the ACDF group, and the stability of the section was good. Conclusion From the perspective of finite element analysis, the cervical vertebrae after PPECD treatment showed good biomechanical performance and stability.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje