Critical Assessment of Single-Use Ureteroscopes in an In Vivo Porcine Model
Autor: | Brian Ceballos, Charles U. Nottingham, Seth K. Bechis, Roger L. Sur, Brian R. Matlaga, Amy E. Krambeck |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Advances in Urology, Vol 2020 (2020) |
Druh dokumentu: | article |
ISSN: | 1687-6369 1687-6377 |
DOI: | 10.1155/2020/3842680 |
Popis: | Introduction and Objectives. In recent years, there has been increasing utilization of single-use ureteroscopes albeit with few studies comparing the performance characteristics between these devices. We compared two commonly utilized single-use ureteroscopes in a porcine model. Methods. A female pig was placed under general anesthesia and positioned supine, and retrograde access to the renal collecting system was obtained. The LithoVue (Boston Scientific) and Uscope (Pusen Medical) were evaluated by three experienced surgeons, and each surgeon started with a new scope. The following parameters were compared between each ureteroscope: time for navigation to upper and lower pole calyces with and without implements (1.9 F basket, 200 μm laser fiber, and 365 μm laser fiber for upper only) in the working channel and subjective evaluations of maneuverability, irrigant flow through the scope, lever force, ergonomics, and scope optics. Results. Navigation to the lower pole calyx was significantly faster with LithoVue compared to Uscope when the working channel was empty (24.3 vs. 49.4 seconds, p |
Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |