Reactogenicity of various COVID-19 vaccination regimens
Autor: | O. M. Drapkina, S. A. Berns, A. Yu. Gorshkov, L. N. Ryzhakova, O. V. Zhdanova, M. G. Chaschin, O. A. Litinskaya |
---|---|
Jazyk: | ruština |
Rok vydání: | 2023 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика, Vol 21, Iss 12 (2023) |
Druh dokumentu: | article |
ISSN: | 1728-8800 2619-0125 |
DOI: | 10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3476 |
Popis: | During the spread of an increasing number of new variants of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), it is extremely important not only to assess the immunogenicity and efficacy, butalso the safety of various combinations of vaccines. Excessive immune response and associated signs and symptoms may occur with varying frequency as expected from the use of vaccines.Aim. To compare the reactogenicity of various (heterologous and homologous) vaccination regimens in a prospective observational study.Material and methods. In individuals aged ≥18 years, in the absence of contraindications to vaccination, two types of vaccines were used at primary vaccination and revaccination: Gam-COVID-Vac and CoviVac: group I (n=97) — Gam-COVID-Vac at each stage of primary and booster vaccination ; group II (n=7) — Gam-COVID-Vck at each stage of primary vaccination, CoviVac at each stage of revaccination; group III (n=42) — CoviVac at each stage of primary vaccination, Gam-COVID-Vac at each stage of revaccination; group IV (n=38) — CoviVac at each stage of primary and secondary vaccination. In all participants, the dynamics of IgG to SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein receptor-binding domain and T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 were determined over time. To control the plasma hemostasis, the method of dynamic thrombophotometry was used. Local and systemic adverse events were assessed.Results. The number of vaccinated individuals with a rise in body temperature above 370 C after the 1st stage of revaccination was significantly (p |
Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |