Safety and efficiency of the port-catheter for intensive intravenous chemotherapy in patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis

Autor: S. O. Cherenko, N. A. Lytvynenko, O. A. Reva, O. V. Khmel, R. A. Veremeenenko, M. V. Pogrebna, Yu. A. Senko
Jazyk: English<br />Ukrainian
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Infusion & Chemotherapy, Iss 1, Pp 19-24 (2018)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2663-0338
2709-0957
DOI: 10.32902/2663-0338-2018-18-1-19-24
Popis: PURPOSE. To study the efficacy and tolerability of the port catheter for continuous intravenous infusion in patients with MDR-TB and XDR-TB. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In a controlled study examined the effectiveness of the port catheter during an intensive 7-component anti-TB treatment with intravenous application of 3 anti-TB drugs (moxifloxacin, PAS, linezolid) in 16 patients with MDR-TB and XDR-TB. In the comparison group, which is formed by a pair of matching according to the drug resistance profile of MTB, the same intensive chemotherapy regimens in which the infusion of these drugs was carried out by daily injections of veins. In each group dominated patients with retreatment cases – 14 (87.5 %) patients. The planned duration of intravenous therapy was 2–4 months. RESULTS. Port-catheter for continuous infusion of combination of anti-tuberculosis drugs in comparison to their administration in the usual way ensures high efficiency and safety. In any case, was not observed phlebitis, no complaints of pain at the injection site, only 12.5 % cases were hematoma after setting the port in comparison to 100.0 % of patients with daily venous injections. In the study group was not a single case of interruption of intravenous infusion. In the control group, 56.2 % of patients discontinued intravenous treatment due to inability to penetrate the vein, patient’s complaints pain or phlebitis. At the end of the intensive phase of chemotherapy sputum conversion and disappearance of clinical symptoms were observed in 15 (3.7 %) patients of the study group, that was 26.7 % higher, than in control group (p>0,05). We found significant difference in terms of sputum conversion, which occurred in the study group through (2,2±0,1) months vs (3,7±0,3) months (
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals