| Popis: |
Shirin Pourafshar,1 Monisha Parikh,2 Bilal Abdallah,2 Nasrin Al Thubian,3 James W Jacobson4 1Medical Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA; 2Medical Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA; 3Medical Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; 4Clinical Affairs, Babson Diagnostics, Austin, TX, USACorrespondence: James W Jacobson, Vice President of Clinical Affairs, Babson Diagnostics, 1321 Rutherford Ln, Bldg 2, Ste 200, Austin, TX, 78753, USA, Tel +1-888-556-8785, Fax +1-512-277-3206, Email James.jacobson@babsondx.comPurpose: Typical barriers to venous blood collection for wellness testing include discomfort, time spent, and collection site accessibility. This study assessed individuals’ experience, satisfaction, and preference associated with a FDA-cleared blood-collection device, the BD MiniDraw™ Capillary Blood Collection System (BD MiniDraw), in retail locations.Patients and Methods: A total of 113 individuals (≥ 18 years) with venous blood collection experience were enrolled; 107 completed the study. A pre-collection survey gathered information on demographics and past experiences with healthcare and venous blood collection settings. BD MiniDraw collection was conducted at three retail sites (two pharmacies and one grocery store) by trained healthcare workers using the Babson BetterWay blood testing service model. A follow up survey was performed two weeks later to determine experience with, and preference for, BD MiniDraw in terms of staff professionalism, blood collection location, blood collection time, and staff trustworthiness.Results: Among the 107 participants, 74 (69%) were female and 33 (31%) were male; the mean age was 49 years (range=18– 71 years). Sixty-six (62%) participants viewed their prior venipuncture experience as “somewhat” or “very” positive. Following capillary collection, 96 (90%) participants expressed a “somewhat” or “very” positive experience with BD MiniDraw at a retail location. In particular, “very satisfied” responses were given for location (87/107; 81%) and collection time (78/1407; 73%). In a subset of respondents (n=89), those reasons (location and time savings) were most frequent for likelihood of future use. Ninety-nine participants (92%) rated the retail blood collection team as “very” or “extremely” trustworthy. Overall, 90 participants (84%) “strongly preferred” (56/107; 52%), “somewhat preferred” (14/107; 13%), or had “no preference” (20/107; 19%) for BD MiniDraw, compared to traditional venous blood collection.Conclusion: Most participants conveyed a preference for BD MiniDraw, primarily based on the blood collection retail location, perceived time savings, and professionalism and trustworthiness of the staff.Keywords: capillary blood collection, phlebotomy, patient preference, blood specimen collection, patient satisfaction |
