Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance reports in suspected myocarditis: A multicenter study

Autor: Kenan Kaya, Carsten Gietzen, Robert Hahnfeldt, Maher Zoubi, Tilman Emrich, Moritz C. Halfmann, Malte Maria Sieren, Yannic Elser, Patrick Krumm, Jan M. Brendel, Konstantin Nikolaou, Nina Haag, Jan Borggrefe, Ricarda von Krüchten, Katharina Müller-Peltzer, Constantin Ehrengut, Timm Denecke, Andreas Hagendorff, Lukas Goertz, Roman J. Gertz, Alexander Christian Bunck, David Maintz, Thorsten Persigehl, Simon Lennartz, Julian A. Luetkens, Astha Jaiswal, Andra Iza Iuga, Lenhard Pennig, Jonathan Kottlors
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol 26, Iss 2, Pp 101068- (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1097-6647
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101068
Popis: ABSTRACT: Background: Diagnosing myocarditis relies on multimodal data, including cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), clinical symptoms, and blood values. The correct interpretation and integration of CMR findings require radiological expertise and knowledge. We aimed to investigate the performance of Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4), a large language model, for report-based medical decision-making in the context of cardiac MRI for suspected myocarditis. Methods: This retrospective study includes CMR reports from 396 patients with suspected myocarditis and eight centers, respectively. CMR reports and patient data including blood values, age, and further clinical information were provided to GPT-4 and radiologists with 1 (resident 1), 2 (resident 2), and 4 years (resident 3) of experience in CMR and knowledge of the 2018 Lake Louise Criteria. The final impression of the report regarding the radiological assessment of whether myocarditis is present or not was not provided. The performance of Generative pre-trained transformer 4 (GPT-4) and the human readers were compared to a consensus reading (two board-certified radiologists with 8 and 10 years of experience in CMR). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. Results: GPT-4 yielded an accuracy of 83%, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 78%, which was comparable to the physician with 1 year of experience (R1: 86%, 90%, 84%, p = 0.14) and lower than that of more experienced physicians (R2: 89%, 86%, 91%, p = 0.007 and R3: 91%, 85%, 96%, p
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals