| Autor: |
Kareem A. Wahid, Renjie He, Brigid A. McDonald, Brian M. Anderson, Travis Salzillo, Sam Mulder, Jarey Wang, Christina Setareh Sharafi, Lance A. McCoy, Mohamed A. Naser, Sara Ahmed, Keith L. Sanders, Abdallah S.R. Mohamed, Yao Ding, Jihong Wang, Kate Hutcheson, Stephen Y. Lai, Clifton D. Fuller, Lisanne V. van Dijk |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology, Vol 20, Iss , Pp 88-93 (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2405-6316 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.phro.2021.11.001 |
| Popis: |
Background and Purpose: Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) poses challenges in quantitative analysis because voxel intensity values lack physical meaning. While intensity standardization methods exist, their effects on head and neck MRI have not been investigated. We developed a workflow based on healthy tissue region of interest (ROI) analysis to determine intensity consistency within a patient cohort. Through this workflow, we systematically evaluated intensity standardization methods for MRI of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Materials and Methods: Two HNC cohorts (30 patients total) were retrospectively analyzed. One cohort was imaged with heterogenous acquisition parameters (HET cohort), whereas the other was imaged with homogenous acquisition parameters (HOM cohort). The standard deviation of cohort-level normalized mean intensity (SD NMIc), a metric of intensity consistency, was calculated across ROIs to determine the effect of five intensity standardization methods on T2-weighted images. For each cohort, a Friedman test followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to compare SD NMIc among methods. Results: Consistency (SD NMIc across ROIs) between unstandardized images was substantially more impaired in the HET cohort (0.29 ± 0.08) than in the HOM cohort (0.15 ± 0.03). Consequently, corrected p-values for intensity standardization methods with lower SD NMIc compared to unstandardized images were significant in the HET cohort (p 0.05). In both cohorts, differences between methods were often minimal and nonsignificant. Conclusions: Our findings stress the importance of intensity standardization, either through the utilization of uniform acquisition parameters or specific intensity standardization methods, and the need for testing intensity consistency before performing quantitative analysis of HNC MRI. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
