Comparation of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion versus uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy
Autor: | Tan Rui, He Wei, Jing Huaibo, Mou Han, Kenneth C. P. Cheung, Chai Yang |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2024 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Frontiers in Medicine, Vol 11 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: | article |
ISSN: | 2296-858X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fmed.2024.1472239 |
Popis: | Study objectiveThis study is to uncover the advantages of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion in the uterine curettage treatment for patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).MethodsTo retrospectively analyze the clinical data of eighty patients with CSP after treatment in our hospital from 01/10/2019 to 01/05/2021. The 80 patients were divided into 2 groups: 41 patients were treated with abdominal aortic balloon occlusion and the control group (n = 39) underwent Uterine artery embolization (UAE). The amount of bleeding during the operation, the operation time of the uterine curettage, the X-ray fluoroscopy time under DSA, the surface dose in radiation, the length of hospital stay (LOS), and the postoperative complications were compared between these 2 groups (type II and type III).ResultsAll the operations successfully retained the uterus. No balloon-related complications occurred in the experimental group. And in the control group, there were 14 cases of fever and 19 cases of pain after UAE. The fluoroscopy time of experimental group and control group were: (type II: (20.3 ± 7.1)s vs. (593.7 ± 284.5)s, p |
Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
načítá se...