| Popis: |
Abstract Background The kidney biopsy is a routine procedure. Once an indication has been established, the benefit–risk balance may be considered. Sometimes, even with effective treatment, a severe complication may develop. Case presentation We present the case of a Caucasian 20-year-old young woman admitted to investigating and treating acute kidney injury. Renal involvement was characterized by kidney damage requiring hemodialysis treatment, positive immunologic testing, 0.5 g/day proteinuria, and microscopic hematuria. Contraindications were excluded, so an ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy was performed. To reduce the bleeding complication, Octostim (desmopressin) was administered. There were no direct complications following the kidney biopsy, so we continued the immunosuppressive treatment. Histologically founded thrombotic microangiopathy. However, 1 week later, severe bleeding developed with the need for urgent surgical left kidney removal. Conclusion Kidney biopsy can be considered a routine procedure, and various bleeding episodes are most common in terms of complications, the detection of which is essential. Delayed bleeding complications are rare and can be caused by minor injuries. Our young patient had no injury during the hospitalization. We hypothesized that the developed serious and delayed bleeding complication resulted from effective immunosuppressive treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such case to date. However, renal biopsy in the case of thrombotic microangiopathy requires caution. |
