Hermeneutical injustice: an exercise in conceptual precision
| Autor: | Blas Radi |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | Spanish; Castilian |
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Estudios de Filosofía, Iss 66, Pp 97-110 (2022) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 0121-3628 2256-358X |
| DOI: | 10.17533/udea.ef.347837 |
| Popis: | In addition to opening a fertile field for inquiry in analytical social epistemology, Miranda Fricker’s work has provided powerful conceptual tools that merge descriptive capacity and political potency. For this reason, over the last fifteen years, the conceptual repertoire introduced by the author has been well received in both academic and political arenas. At times, the concepts of both testimonial and hermeneutical injustice acquire excessive dimensions in the literature, and this undermines, on the one hand, their analytical precision and, on the other, their usefulness. In this paper I argue against Fricker’s structural parallelism thesis and defend an independent treatment of each of these concepts. On this basis, to counteract the hyperinflation of the concept of hermeneutic injustice, I proceed with an exercise of conceptual precision. To this end, I identify the conditions that make hermeneutic injustice both unjust and hermeneutic. Finally, I present theoretical and practical reasons to encourage the rigorous use of these concepts. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|