Optimal Timing of Invasive Coronary Angiography following NSTEMI

Autor: Thabo Mahendiran, David Nanchen, David Meier, Baris Gencer, Roland Klingenberg, Lorenz Räber, David Carballo, Christian M. Matter, Thomas F. Lüscher, Stephan Windecker, François Mach, Nicolas Rodondi, Olivier Muller, Stephane Fournier
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Interventional Cardiology, Vol 2020 (2020)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 0896-4327
1540-8183
DOI: 10.1155/2020/8513257
Popis: Objective. To obtain a real-world perspective of the optimal timing of angiography performed within 24 hours of admission with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Background. Current guidelines recommend angiography within 24 hours of hospitalisation with NSTEMI. The recent VERDICT trial found that angiography within 12 hours of admission with NSTEMI was associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes among high-risk patients. We compared the outcomes of real-world NSTEMI patients undergoing angiography within 12 hours of admission with those of patients undergoing angiography 12 to 24 hours after admission. Methods. NSTEMI patients without life-threatening features who received angiography within 24 hours of admission were obtained from the SPUM-ACS registry, a cohort of consecutive patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes to four university hospitals in Switzerland. Cox models assessed for an association between door-to-catheter time and one-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke). Results. Of 2672 NSTEMI patients, 1832 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 1464 patients underwent angiography within 12 hours (12 h group) compared with 368 patients between 12 and 24 hours (12–24 h group). Multiple logistic regression identified out-of-hours admission as the only factor associated with delayed angiography. After 2 : 1 propensity score matching, 736 patients from the 12 h group and 368 patients from the 12–24 h group demonstrated no significant difference in rates of one-year MACE (7.7% vs. 7.3%, HR: 1.050, 95% CI 0.637–1.733, p=0.847). Stratification by GRACE score (>140 vs. ≤140) found no significant reduction in MACE among high-risk patients in the 12 h group (p for interaction = 0.601). Conclusions. In an unselected real-world cohort of NSTEMI patients, angiography within 12 hours of admission was not associated with improved one-year cardiovascular outcomes when compared with angiography 12 and 24 hours after admission, even among high-risk patients.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje