| Popis: |
Background Establishing the advantageous diseases in the field of traditional Chinese orthopedics treated with manual therapy will promote the development of manual techniques and dominant discipline. However, the current evaluation and selection lack a quantitative evaluation process based on evidence-based medicine. Objective To systematically review systematic reviews of diseases in the field of traditional Chinese orthopedics treated with manual therapy using evidence mapping methodology and explore the advantageous diseases in this field. Methods Computerized searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP database to collect systematic reviews of diseases in the field of traditional Chinese orthopedics treated with manual therapy from inception to March 5, 2023. The evidence distribution characteristics were presented using a combination of charts and text. Results A total of 126 systematic reviews published from 2003 to 2023 were included, showing an overall increasing trend in the quantity of relevant studies both domestically and internationally. Methodological quality assessment results indicated that 13 reviews were of moderate quality, 64 were of low quality, and 49 were of very low quality. The evidence map showed that the research evidence in the field of traditional Chinese orthopedics treated with manual therapy mainly focused on 18 clinical diseases, including cervical spondylosis, low back pain, knee osteoarthritis, lumbar disc herniation, ankle sprain, adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, cervicogenic headache, atlantoaxial subluxation, distal radius fracture, lateral epicondylitis of the humerus, carpal tunnel syndrome, lumbar sprain, scoliosis, hip osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia syndrome, myofascial pain syndrome, rotator cuff injury, and supracondylar fracture of the humerus, demonstrating beneficial or potentially beneficial effects. Conclusion Manual therapy is widely used in the clinical practice of traditional Chinese orthopedics. However, due to methodological shortcomings and a lack of research evidence on safety and cost-effectiveness, future efforts should focus on multi-level inter-agency cooperation to establish sound evaluation standards and systems, improve research quality, update research evidence, and further explore the advantages of manual therapy in the field of traditional Chinese orthopedics. |
