Self-Reported Data and Physician-Reported Data in Patients With Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: Comparative Analysis

Autor: Irena Doubelt, Jason M Springer, Tanaz A Kermani, Antoine G Sreih, Cristina Burroughs, David Cuthbertson, Simon Carette, Nader A Khalidi, Curry L Koening, Carol Langford, Carol A McAlear, Larry W Moreland, Paul A Monach, Dianne G Shaw, Philip Seo, Ulrich Specks, Kenneth J Warrington, Kalen Young, Peter A Merkel, Christian Pagnoux
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Interactive Journal of Medical Research, Vol 11, Iss 1, p e27273 (2022)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1929-073X
DOI: 10.2196/27273
Popis: BackgroundPatient-based registries can help advance research on rare diseases such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), a complex multiorgan form of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to compare patient-reported and physician-reported data on manifestations, treatments, and outcomes for patients with EGPA. MethodsWe completed a comparative analysis of patients ≥18 years with EGPA in Canada and the United States from the following 2 cohorts: (1) The Vasculitis Patient-Powered Research Network (VPPRN), a self-enrolled secure portal with patient-entered data updated quarterly (2014-2019) and (2) the Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium (VCRC) observational studies, a physician-entered database (2003-2019) of patients who fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for EGPA. The studied parameters included demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, ANCA status, treatments, and relapses. ResultsData from 195 patients with a validated diagnosis of EGPA in the VPPRN and 354 patients enrolled in the VCRC were analyzed. Compared to the VCRC cohort, the patients in the VPPRN cohort were more likely to be female (135/195, 69.2% compared to 209/354, 59%; P=.02) and younger at diagnosis (47.3 compared to 50.0 years; P=.03); both cohorts reported similar frequencies of asthma (177/184, 96.2% in the VPPRN cohort compared to 329/354, 92.9% in the VCRC cohort; P=.13) and cardiac manifestations (44/153, 28.8% compared to 75/354, 21.2%; P=.06), but the VPPRN cohort reported less frequent lung manifestations other than asthma and more frequent disease manifestations in all other organ systems. The ANCA positivity was 48.9% (64/131) in the VPPRN patients compared to 38.9% (123/316; P=.05) in the VCRC cohort. Relapsing disease after study enrollment was reported in 32.3% (63/195) of patients in the VPPRN compared to 35.7% (99/277) of patients in the VCRC. Most therapies (GC, cyclophosphamide, mepolizumab) were used at similar frequencies in both groups, except for rituximab with VPPRN patients reporting more use than the VCRC cohort (47/195, 24.1% compared to 29/277, 10.5%; P
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals