| Autor: |
Eduardo Anitua, Asier Lazcano, Asier Eguia, Mohammad Hamdan Alkhraisat |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2024 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Dentistry Journal, Vol 12, Iss 10, p 298 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2304-6767 |
| DOI: |
10.3390/dj12100298 |
| Popis: |
Introduction: Digital workflow and intraoral scanners (IOSs) are used to clinically obtain data for a wide range of applications in restorative dentistry. The study aimed to compare two different IOSs with inexperienced users in the digital workflow of oral split manufacturing. Material and Methods: Anonymous stone models of upper and lower dentate patients were used. Both models were scanned with a desktop 3D scanner 3Shape D2000 to obtain the reference models (STLR). Ten inexperienced operators scanned each model three times with each IOS system (3Shape TRIOS 3 and Carestream CS 3800). Finally, 20 intraoral scanners were randomly chosen from the obtained dataset (10 per IOS system) to design and manufacture 20 nightguards. All the nightguards were scanned. Trueness and precision were calculated and compared between the two IOS systems. Results: All the mean errors both for trueness and precision were below 40 µm, more than acceptable for the design and manufacturing of intraoral devices such as nightguards. All the mean errors (except one) for trueness between the inner part of the nightguards and the upper control model were below 100 µm, less than a printed layer height. For inexperienced operators, both IOSs are suitable for a digital workflow of manufacturing occlusal splints. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
