Autor: |
Karam R. Motawea, Samah S. Rouzan, Rowan H. Elhalag, Abdelrhaman M. Abdelwahab, Hussam Al Hennawi, Salem Elshenawy, Mai Saad Mohamed, Pensée Chébl, Mohamed Salem Madian, Mostafa Elsayed Elsayed Hewalla, Sarya Swed, Wael Hafez, Bisher Sawaf, Samer Kaspo, Naim Battikh, Mohammed Najdat Seijari, Amr Farwati, Amine Rakab |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2024 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
BMC Surgery, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
1471-2482 |
DOI: |
10.1186/s12893-024-02555-4 |
Popis: |
Abstract Background Techniques in endovascular therapy have evolved to offer a promising alternative to medical therapy alone for Type B aortic dissections (TBADs). Aim The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare mortality and overall complications between thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and best medical therapy (BMT) in patients with TBADs. Methods We included randomized control trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared TEVAR and BMT for the treatment of type B aortic dissection. Multiple electronic databases were searched. Results Thirty-two cohort studies including 150,836 patients were included. TEVAR was associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate than BMT (RR = 0.79, CI = 0.63, 0.99, P = 0.04), notably in patients ≥ 65 years of age (RR = 0.78, CI = 0.64, 0.95, P = 0.01). The TEVAR group had a significantly prolonged hospital stay (MD = 3.42, CI = 1.69, 5.13, P = 0.0001) and ICU stay (MD = 3.18, CI = 1.48, 4.89, P = 0.0003) compared to the BMT. BMT was associated with increased stroke risk (RR = 1.52, CI = 1.29, 1.79, P |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|