Comparison of Shaping Ability of 10 Rotary and Reciprocating Systems: an In Vitro Study with AutoCAD
| Autor: | Jorge Rubio, José Ignacio Zarzosa, Antonio Pallarés |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | English<br />Croatian |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Acta Stomatologica Croatica, Vol 51, Iss 3, Pp 207-216 (2017) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 0001-7019 1846-0410 |
| DOI: | 10.15644/asc51/3/4 |
| Popis: | Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the cutting are, root canal anatomy preservation and non-instrumented areas of F360®, F6-SkyTaper®, Hyflex-EDM®, iRACE®, Neoniti®, O.Shape®, P.Next®, Reciproc®, Revo-S® and Wave-One-Gold® size 25 files. Materials and Methods: 300 teeth with a single straight root and a circular or elliptical root canal were divided into 10 groups (1-F360®, 2- F6-SkyTaper®, 3-Hyflex-EDM®, 4-iRACE®, 5-Neoniti®, 6-O.Shape®, 7-P.Next®, 8-Reciproc®, 9-Revo-S® and 10-Wave-One-Gold®) cut into 3 cross sections using an ultrafine cutting disc. They were photographed under a stereo microscope and preinstrumentation analyses were made before rebuilding the teeth with# 10 K- File and epoxy glue. A glide path was created with #10 and #15 K files and each group was instrumented using rotary or reciprocating systems. Cutting areas, root canal anatomy preservation and non-instrumented areas were analyzed using the AutoCAD 2015 Levene’s test, the Welch´s test, and the Games-Howell´s test. The Pearson’s chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Levene’s test showed no equality of variances (P0.05). In non-instrumented areas, significant differences were found (P |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|