| Popis: |
The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of lessons learned from experimental cardiac arrest studies, limitations, translation to clinical studies, ethical considerations and future directions.Cardiac arrest animal studies have provided valuable insights into the pathophysiology of cardiac arrest, the effects of various interventions, and the development of resuscitation techniques. However, there are limitations to animal models that should be considered when interpreting results. Systematic reviews have demonstrated that animal models rarely reflect the clinical condition seen in humans, nor the complex treatment that occurs during and after a cardiac arrest. Furthermore, animal models of cardiac arrest are at a significant risk of bias due to fundamental issues in performing and/or reporting critical methodological aspects. Conducting clinical trials targeting the management of rare cardiac arrest causes like e.g. hyperkalemia and pulmonary embolism is challenging due to the scarcity of eligible patients. For these research questions, animal models might provide the highest level of evidence and can potentially guide clinical practice.To continuously push cardiac arrest science forward, animal studies must be conducted and reported rigorously, designed to avoid bias and answer specific research questions. To ensure the continued relevance and generation of valuable new insights from animal studies, new approaches and techniques may be needed, including animal register studies, systematic reviews and multilaboratory trials. |
