| Popis: |
Paweł Radkowski,1– 3 Agnieszka Barańska,1 Marcin Mieszkowski,1,2 Justyna Dawidowska-Fidrych,4 Katarzyna Podhorodecka1 1Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Regional Specialist Teaching Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland; 2Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland; 3Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hospital zum heiligen Geist, Fritzlar, Germany; 4Pediatric Department, Hospital Pro-Medica, Ełk, PolandCorrespondence: Katarzyna Podhorodecka, Email k.podhorodecka1@gmail.comAbstract: The administration of general anesthesia is a crucial aspect of surgery. However, it can pose significant risks to patients, such as respiratory depression and prolonged neuromuscular blockade. To avoid such complications, it is essential to monitor neuromuscular transmission during anesthesia. While clinical tests have been used for decades to evaluate muscle function, they are now known to be unreliable, and relying on them increases the risk of postoperative complications. Thankfully, there are now six methods available for neuromuscular monitoring during anesthesia: mechanomyography, acceleromyography, electromyography, kinemyography, phonomyography, and compressomyography. Each of these methods differs in terms of their approach and methodology, and their importance in clinical practice varies accordingly. Mechanomyography involves measuring the mechanical response of a muscle to nerve stimulation, while acceleromyography measures the acceleration of muscle contraction. Electromyography records the electrical activity of muscles, while kinemyography tracks muscle movement. Phonomyography records the sound waves produced by contracting muscles, and compressomyography involves monitoring the pressure changes in a muscle during contraction. Overall, understanding the differences between these methods and their clinical significance is crucial for anesthesiologists. This review aims to provide an updated understanding of the current methods available for neuromuscular monitoring during anesthesia, so that anesthesiologists can make informed decisions about patient care and reduce the risk of postoperative complications.Keywords: neuromuscular monitoring, neuromuscular blockade, peripheral nerve stimulation, anesthesiology, review |
