| Autor: |
Richard O’Shea, Richen Lin, David Wall, James Browne, Jerry Murphy |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Biofuel Research Journal, Vol 8, Iss 3, Pp 1417-1432 (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2292-8782 |
| DOI: |
10.18331/BRJ2021.8.3.2 |
| Popis: |
The anaerobic digestion (AD) of distillery by-products presents benefits such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emission savings and electricity savings, as well as drawbacks such as reduced animal feed and protein production and the potential import of animal feeds. This work balances these benefits and drawbacks using compromise programming (CP). The best combination of by-products (from 9,261 scenarios) to use in AD was selected based on criteria chosen by management of a large distillery. The use of all by-products maximises benefits and drawbacks; the contrary also applies. When benefits and drawbacks are equally important, CP recommends using 50% of available draff, 50% of available thick stillage, and 55% of available thin stillage. The best combination when accounting for criteria weights chosen by distillery management is the use of 100% of available draff and 100% of available thick stillage. This could replace 48% of natural gas consumption at the distillery, reduce Scope 1 emissions by 45%, achieve a Scope 3 emissions savings of 22% of current Scope 1 emissions, and reduce electricity consumption in the feeds recovery plant of the distillery by 63%. Protein loss of 9,618 t could require the import of 19.59 kilo-tonne wet weight of material (ktwwt) of distillers grains and 9.15 ktwwt of soybean meal. If different criteria or criteria weights were used, a different result would be recommended. The methodology developed herein can aid in decarbonising the food and beverage industry by allowing decision-makers to balance the benefits and drawbacks of AD while accounting for subjective preferences. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
