Autor: |
Dalia Abd El Sattar El Embaby, Fatema AlZahraa Abdellatif Abdullah, Emad Korraa, Heba Shalaby, Eman Abdel-Salam Ibrahim, Wael Emam, Rehab M. Mohammad |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2024 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2314-8551 |
DOI: |
10.1186/s43168-024-00328-4 |
Popis: |
Abstract Background Appropriate staging of lung cancer is of paramount importance, as it customizes treatment and predicts prognosis. Both Fludeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with contrast computed tomography (CT) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are two widely used diagnostic modalities in the field of staging & diagnosis of lung malignancies, the former depends on image analysis while the later enables real-time sampling of lymph nodes under sonographic guidance. Objective To compare the diagnostic and staging accuracy of convex probe EBUS-TBNA versus FDG – PET/CT as two modalities in diagnosis & mediastinal staging of lung cancer patients. Methods This prospective, observational (daignostic accuracy) research was performed on 40 cases with lung malignancies. All cases were examined via FDG-PET/CT followed by convex probe EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis & staging of concurrent mediastinal lymphadenopathy (MLN). Results The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA reached 92.5% (37/40) compared to 70% (28/40) for FDG-PET/CT. There was poor agreement between EBUS-TBNA & FDG-PET/CT regarding (MLN) staging (k = 0.043), in 16/40 patients (40%), EBUS MLN staging matched that of FDG-PET/CT, while in 24/40(60%) there were discrepancies between the two diagnostic modalities; 18/40(45%) were up-staged after EBUS while 6/40(15%) were down staged after EBUS. In addition, EBUS-TBNA confirmed occult mediastinal nodal involvement in 9/10 FDG-PET/CT negative scans (N0). The overall diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA was significantly greater than FDG-PET/CT in staging of lung cancer (97.37% & 70% respectively, p |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|